News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
The Cambridge City Council asked the city’s Community Development Department to work toward a pilot program for municipally-funded housing vouchers as the city attempts to deal with the growing waitlist for affordable apartments.
The City Council held a Tuesday hearing of the Housing Committee on the proposal after first introducing it via policy order in February.
“To sum up some of the direction you’re getting is to perhaps start thinking about a project-based voucher approach,” Councilor Sumbul Siddiqui said to CDD Housing Director Chris Cotter during the meeting.
Currently, the Cambridge Housing Authority issues the majority of Cambridge housing vouchers, which are mostly funded by federal programs. The vouchers are largely tenant-based, meaning they are issued directly to tenants for use on the private market and come at an estimated cost of almost $44,000 per unit per year for a household earning less than 50 percent of the area median income.
But the Council asked the CDD to look into providing project-based vouchers, which are attached to individual affordable units and come at a considerably lower cost. The vouchers would be funded by the municipal budget, rather than federal funds.
“We see project-based vouchers very often used to assist buildings that are either fully affordable or mostly affordable with the affordable housing providers,” Cotter said.
As the Council continues to look at ending single-family zoning, councilors specifically requested that the CDD look further into the implementation of project-based vouchers in multifamily housing, which include a fraction of affordable units under the city’s inclusionary housing program.
“One of the things we talked about is that with inclusionary program that those units are not as deeply affordable as we like,” Councilor Burhan Azeem said, pointing to project-based vouchers as a potential avenue.
Cotter said project-based vouchers were generally absent in multifamily housing, as many low-income tenants use tenant-based vouchers instead.
“We don’t see the project-based vouchers in the inclusionary stock,” Cotter said.
Councilors said the approach holds potential for increasing housing stability for Cambridge’s rent-burdened tenants, encouraging the CDD to begin working toward a pilot program for municipally funded vouchers.
Additionally, the Committee urged the CDD to collect data and work with the communities that would most benefit from project-based vouchers — including low-income renters, families, and caretakers.
“I’ve really felt like I hear the most from rent-burdened populations, and especially rent-burdened folks in inclusionary,” Siddiqui said, referring to tenants in units built through the inclusionary housing program.
—Staff writer Laurel M. Shugart can be reached at laurel.shugart@thecrimson.com. Follow them on X @laurelmshugart or on Threads @laurel.shugart.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.