News

About 300 Mass General Brigham Primary Care Physicians File NLRB Petition to Unionize

News

Cambridge Will Ask State Legislature to Allow Use of Traffic Cameras

News

David Laibson, Rumored Frontrunner for College Dean, Says He Doesn’t Want It

News

Jews for Palestine Rally Outside Harvard Hillel to Protest Former IDF Spokesperson

News

Abby Phillip Says Nontraditional Media Outlets Helped Trump Win at Harvard IOP Forum

ABC News’ Elliott Morris and Stephen Ansolabehere Talk Polling and Voting Trends

The Center for American Political Studies is located in CGIS South.
The Center for American Political Studies is located in CGIS South. By Julian J. Giordano
By Fahim Aseer and Summer E. Rose, Contributing Writers

Harvard Government professor Stephen D. Ansolabehere and ABC News Editorial Director of Data Analytics Elliott Morris discussed the accuracy of polling data on the 2024 election at an event hosted by the Institute of Politics and the Center for American Political Studies.

At the event, moderated by CAPS Director and Government professor Ryan D. Enos, the speakers discussed how polling results could explain voting patterns and the outcome of the 2024 elections. The conversation also included an in-depth discussion of Democratic polling bias and voting patterns among different demographic groups.

Discussing the limitations of the currently available data, Enos said that “to really learn what happened, that’s going to take months if not years.”

The speakers also discussed the attempts made to provide reasoning for the voting patterns among different demographic groups. “I think that the really surprising things this election are a bunch of non-findings,” Ansolabehere said.

“I cannot tell you how many op-eds I’ve read about this being a class backlash among young white men,” he said. “There wasn’t any change in 2024. They voted the same way.”

“So, justifiably, given the stakes, there’s been a ton of commentary on the election in the last couple of weeks. And unfortunately, I think from a lot of our perspectives, almost all that’s basically based on vibes,” Enos added.

He said these perspectives “can kind of lead you to whatever story you prefer."

The speakers also discussed the Democratic bias of polling data when compared to the election results.

“I don’t think it’s people that are shy to say that they’re supportive of Trump,” Morris said. “Our hypothesis has been that if you’re more Trumpy, abstracting all your other group identities, then you’re less likely to answer the phone.”

“Exit polls have always been biased in the Democratic direction since the 1970s, and we've known that,” Ansolabehere added. “We analyzed it extensively, we cannot figure out what it is. Doesn't matter if it’s Trump or not, it goes all with that.”

Ansolabehere also addressed the urban and rural split in Hispanic voting patterns, namely in Texas.

“The Democrats are clearly losing ground with these kinds of non-urban working class Hispanics,” Ansolabehere said. He said the same applied to “a lot of the shift in New Jersey and New York away from the Democrats.”

In an interview with The Crimson after the event, Ansolabehere discussed how technological advancement will lead to the use of newer and more accurate methods to facilitate polling.

“I think there are going to be some very interesting changes coming around — just the use of mobile devices that’ll make it much easier to contact people. The challenge then will be to understand who we’re thinking about,” Ansolabehere said.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
IOPHarvard Kennedy School2024 Election2024 Elections