News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

CIA Director Discusses ISIS, Iranian Nuclear Negotiations

CIA Director John O. Brennan discusses policies in the Middle East at the Institute of Politics on Tuesday night. The ticketed discussion, moderated by Belfer Center Director Graham T. Allison,  focused on Iranian nuclear negotiations and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
CIA Director John O. Brennan discusses policies in the Middle East at the Institute of Politics on Tuesday night. The ticketed discussion, moderated by Belfer Center Director Graham T. Allison, focused on Iranian nuclear negotiations and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. By Y. Kit Wu
By Luca F. Schroeder, Crimson Staff Writer

Central Intelligence Agency Director John O. Brennan spoke at the Institute of Politics on Tuesday about the ongoing Iranian nuclear negotiations and the challenges of combating radical militant groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

The John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum event, moderated by Belfer Center Director and former Kennedy School Dean Graham T. Allison, comes a little more than two years after Brennan was sworn in as CIA Director in March 2013. Brennan had previously served as the U.S. Homeland Security Advisor under President Barack Obama and as interim director of the National Counterterrorism Center he helped establish.

Brennan expressed approval of the framework deal revealed  last week on the future of the Iranian nuclear program, highlighting the new proposed inspection regimes and limits on enrichment as significant achievements.

“The individuals who say that this deal provides a pathway for Iran to a bomb are being wholly disingenuous in my view,” Brennan said. “If you look at…what it has done, preventing Iran, limiting Iran, for fifteen, twenty years in a variety of ways—I’m certainly pleasantly surprised that the Iranians have agreed to so much here.”

Brennan acknowledged, however, that Iran’s “track record of causing trouble in the region,” particularly “sponsoring different insurgencies,” warranted “carefully watch[ing]” the country regardless of the outcome of the nuclear negotiations.

When asked about ISIS, Brennan characterized the group as a force that many Middle Eastern governments, lacking sufficient military capabilities and institutions, are unable to challenge.

“Unquestionably, violence has become a way of life in these societies and cultures,” Brennan said. “The natural gravitational pull for people who are alienated with a lack of good governance, a lack of getting food and jobs, is to go to one of these groups that has as their raison d’être opposition to the central government.”

Brennan also said the U.S. counterterrorism effort was not in itself designed to resolve but rather provide time to resolve Middle Eastern tensions and crises.

A New York Times reporter asks a question to CIA Director John O. Brennan regarding economic sanctions, politics, and the nuclear weapons program in the Islamic State of Iran and the impact of sanctions relief on the framework deal reached between the U.S. and Iran last week.
A New York Times reporter asks a question to CIA Director John O. Brennan regarding economic sanctions, politics, and the nuclear weapons program in the Islamic State of Iran and the impact of sanctions relief on the framework deal reached between the U.S. and Iran last week. By Y. Kit Wu

“There’s no way that we can kill our way out of this challenge,” Brennan said. “We need to be able to stop those plots, those activities that threaten us as well as our partners and try to bring it down so that some of the political processes that need to take root can—that’s going to be a long and challenging road.”

Brennan also spoke about his ongoing effort to modernize the CIA and prepare it for a new age of asymmetric cyber warfare.

“The purpose behind this modernization effort is to make sure that CIA officers understand all of the arrows in our quiver, all of the things we can do that will be able to address our national security challenges,” Brennan said. “Different parts of the agency sometimes were separated from one another and compartmented and people didn’t have a full appreciation of some of the capabilities they could leverage.”

—Staff writer Luca F. Schroeder can be reached at luca.schroeder@thecrimson.com. Follow him on Twitter @lucaschroeder.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
IOPPoliticsHarvard Kennedy SchoolUniversityUniversity News

Related Articles

CIA Director at the IOP