News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
At least for one game, the Harvard men’s basketball team would have
been well served to summon the spirit of its dreadful 2003-04 season.
Despite going 4-23 overall and 3-11 in the Ivy League during
that campaign—the school’s worst in over 50 years—the Crimson managed
to pull off a spirited upset of Yale at home to snap a six-game losing
streak, the highlight of an otherwise mostly dismal year.
Two years and four days later, on Saturday night at Lavietes
Pavilion, there would be no reenactment of that streak-snapping
victory.
Instead of serving as a high point, the team’s 77-66 loss to
the Bulldogs—Harvard’s fifth straight loss and fourth in a row at
home—marked the nadir of its season.
While Yale coach James Jones and his players hung around the
court after the game, soaking in their first win at Lavietes in three
years and their first road victory of the league season, members of the
Crimson remained in the home locker room after the latest installment
in a continuing series of disappointments. In a telling sign of the
team’s dejection, the players were made explicitly unavailable for
comment for the first time at home.
Harvard coach Frank Sullivan called it “just a discouraging
weekend, and a discouraging follow-up to a difficult game [on Friday
against Brown]. Yale bounced back from their adversity”—a Friday night
road loss at Dartmouth—”a little bit better than we did.”
After beginning the year 8-3, the Crimson has now lost eight
of its last 11 games to fall out of contention in the Ivy League title
hunt and put in jeopardy its goal of achieving a winning season for the
first time in four years.
DEFENSE DOMINATED
Following a defensive breakdown Friday night against Brown,
which shot 55 percent and scored 43 points in the paint in its 79-66
victory, the Crimson was again dismantled inside by Yale.
Harvard was unable to contain Bulldogs center Dominick
Martin, who poured in a career-high 26 points, the majority of which
came on lay-ups or short jump shots. Entering the weekend shooting .569
from the floor for the season, Martin connected on 12 of his 18
attempts.
“Our defense both nights, and especially tonight, was very
soft near the rim area,” Sullivan said. “When we get back to trying to
correct what we’ve got to work on for the next two weeks, one of them
is getting tougher around the basket.”
Yale’s perimeter players, chiefly point guard Eric Flato,
consistently were able to penetrate Harvard’s initial line of defense
and enter the paint. Senior center Brian Cusworth, charged with
guarding Martin, was often forced to rotate on defense, leaving his
assignment open around the basket.
“We penetrated from the perimeter pretty well, and Cusworth
had to come over and help on our guards,” said Flato, who also
contributed 19 points, including four crucial three-pointers. “I think
it all generates from the perimeter.”
“[Martin is] a big part of what we do, our offensive design,
to get the ball inside to him,” Jones added. “I think Dominick is one
of the most dominant players in the league.”
Martin’s performance negated the noteworthy offensive effort
of Cusworth, who scored a career-high 24 points on 9-of-19 shooting.
Cusworth’s strong play could not compensate for the multitude of easy
buckets Yale generated, especially with frustrated captain Matt Stehle
uncharacteristically struggling to impact the game. Shooting from the
outside much more than normal, the senior forward scored a season-low
six points on 1-of-11 from the field.
HOUSE UNPROTECTED
Yale entered the game with a 5-0 record at home against Ivy
foes and a 0-4 mark away from the raucous confines of the John J. Lee
Amphitheater.
That split has been a consistent weakness of Yale teams
through the years, leading to speculation that the Bulldogs were due
for a fall in the standings once their number of road league games
equaled out their home contests.
“A lot’s been talked about that, and we’ve lost for a number
of different reasons,” Jones said. “I think we’re the same team [at
home and away]. Obviously when we’re home we get a little bit more
energy from the crowd, but it’s nice to get the monkey off your back
and finally get one.”
Harvard is one of the five Ivy teams that went down to Yale in
New Haven so far this year. Last month’s bitter 82-74 Crimson defeat
seemed to hinge as much on the emotions generated by the Yale crowd’s
rancorous baiting of Harvard’s players as on any other factor.
Lavietes Pavilion did not offer the same home-court advantage
as John J. Lee, however, providing a comfort zone for Yale’s players.
“The reason why we have such a good home record is because of
our fans,” Flato said. “It’s a lot easier when you don’t have people
yelling at you every time you touch the ball, and stuff like that. I
think that eases the game for our players, to play at a place where the
fans aren’t yelling and aren’t so active.”
—Staff writer Caleb W. Peiffer can be reached at cpeiffer@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.