News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
Massachusetts’ top court ruled today that Harvard’s police department does not have to
release incident reports sought by The Crimson because it is a private
police force.
Two-and-a-half years after the case was first filed by the
paper, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled unanimously for Harvard,
rejecting The Crimson’s claim that since the Harvard University Police
Department (HUPD) is endowed with “special state police powers”—such as
the power to make an arrest and obtain and execute a search warrant—it
must provide the same information as public police forces.
The Court also rejected The Crimson’s claims that private
entities, once endowed with certain state powers, become public
entities. Instead, the Court held that even when granted special
powers, HUPD does not become “an agency of the Commonwealth such that
it becomes subject to the mandates of the public records law.”
The Court’s ruling on a case it heard on Nov. 7, 2005
ends a legal battle that began in late July 2003.
The case was originally heard by Middlesex Superior Court Justice Nancy
Staffier, who dismissed the suit in March 2004.
Robert
W. Iuliano ’83, Harvard’s general counsel, praised the decision in a
statement released today for recognizing the University’s compelling
interest in preserving students’ privacy and highlighting HUPD’s
practice of releasing crime reports whenever an arrest is made.
"The opinion upholds the University's decision to protect our students'
privacy while at the same time recognizes that when the Harvard
University Police Department makes arrests, records are available to
the public," Iuliano said.
In a
hearing before the SJC in November, Iuliano argued that the University
has a compelling interest in withholding the names of students who have
encounters with HUPD but are not arrested.
Crimson President Lauren A.E. Schuker ’06 expressed her
disappointment with the decision in a statement today. But she
vowed to continue The Crimson’s effort by working with Massachusetts
State Senator Jarrett T. Barrios ’90 to pass legislation intoduced in 2004, which would require
university police departements to disclose more detailed reports.
"The current law, requiring campus state police departments to issue
daily logs, was enacted thanks to the hard work of The Crimson, so we
are following in historical footsteps continuing this fight," Schuker
wrote.
The Crimson’s lawyers could not be reached for comment this evening.
—Please check thecrimson.com for updates.
—Staff writer Benjamin L. Weintraub can be reached at bweintr@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.