News
Harvard Lampoon Claims The Crimson Endorsed Trump at Pennsylvania Rally
News
Mass. DCR to Begin $1.5 Million Safety Upgrades to Memorial Drive Monday
Sports
Harvard Football Topples No. 16/21 UNH in Bounce-Back Win
Sports
After Tough Loss at Brown, Harvard Football Looks to Keep Ivy Title Hopes Alive
News
Harvard’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Increased by 2.3 Percentage Points in 2023
A campaign staffer for John F. Voith ’07 approached a staffer for
Magnus Grimeland ’07 last week, suggesting Grimeland drop out of the
race for Undergraduate Council (UC) president and “join forces” against
John S. Haddock ’07.
“I talked to Voith and [running-mate] Tara [Gadgil ’07], and
they would literally LOVE to have him on board with us,” an e-mail from
the Voith staffer said, advocating that Grimeland exit the race in
exchange for favors from Voith and Gadgil.
In the e-mail, sent Thursday afternoon to Grimeland campaign
member Wojtek P. Kaszynski ’07 and obtained last night by The Crimson,
the Voith staffer promises that Voith and Gadgil would reimburse
Grimeland and his running-mate Thomas D. Hadfield ’08 for their
campaign expenses, ensure that Grimeland be reinstated on the UC after
a temporary expulsion, and “make Magnus and Tom prominent voices in the
UC, and promote everything that Magnus and Tom would propose if they
get elected.”
But UC candidates may only spend up to $400 on the campaign
and are reimbursed for all expenses by the UC, Grimeland was reinstated
at a meeting Friday night, and none of the UC’s executive board
positions are appointed by the UC leadership.
And while the e-mail promises Voith and Gadgil’s support for
“everything Magnus and Tom would propose,” the Grimeland-Hadfield
ticket differs significantly from the Voith-Gadgil ticket, with
Grimeland focusing primarily on ambitious proposals to increase funding
for student needs through a student-run investment fund and an
endowment for student groups.
“I think this would be great for all of us, given that Magnus
and Voith have similar supporters, and we all know each other,” the
e-mail said.
Gadgil said she and Voith were not aware of the e-mail before it was sent and did not endorse its contents.
“Both John Voith and myself have a lot of respect for the
campaign that Magnus and Tom have run and the dialogue that an
additional ticket has created,” Gadgil said. “I had no knowledge that
that e-mail was going to be sent.”
The authenticity of the e-mail, provided to The Crimson on the
condition that its author remain anonymous, was confirmed by Kaszynski
last night.
The e-mail proposed “an informal meeting over the weekend, like, lunch in some nice restaurant.”
“[Let's] just chill out and talk about it,” the e-mail said. “We’ll pay for it, too, biatch.”
Grimeland said that he was not considering dropping out of the
race and saw the e-mail proposal as a reflection of the strength of his
campaign.
“We were really a little disappointed about it—it’s basically
trying to buy us out of the race and additionally trying to use some
powers that they don’t really have,” Grimeland said. “I think it’s a
response to them getting afraid we were getting a lot of votes from
them and gaining a lot of momentum.”
Grimeland was expelled from the UC after unexcused absences
but was unanimously reinstated Friday night after meeting with the
Executive Board, which includes the UC’s president, vice president,
secretary, treasurer, and committee chairs, two of which are Voith and
Gadgil.
Gadgil said that she and Voith first learned of the e-mail at that meeting.
UC president Matthew J. Glazer, who was present at the Friday
meeting, confirmed that Grimeland brought up the e-mail at that time.
“I encouraged both campaigns to work out this problem between
them,” Glazer said. “As far as I understand, the two campaigns worked
it out.”
The e-mail marks a second instance in which a member of the
Voith-Gadgil campaign staff has taken an action of which the candidates
have disavowed knowledge.
About two weeks ago, a member of the Voith-Gadgil campaign
registered the domain name www.haddockriley.com. At that time, Voith
said that he did not know about the registration before he was
contacted by The Crimson.
Voith could not be reached for comment for this article.
Gadgil said that the rules of the election had been outlined to her ticket’s campaign staff.
“I think that we have been disappointed in the select decisions
of a few people in our campaign and we have laid down to them that such
actions are inappropriate in an election in which we aim to be as
positive and fair as possible,” Gadgil said.
—Staff writer Katharine A. Kaplan can be reached at kkaplan@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.