News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
To the editors:
I was surprised and disappointed to see
The Crimson publish a story about Norman G. Finkelstein’s demonstrably
false accusations against me without the reporter having called me to
respond to these charges. I know that The Crimson, like other reputable
newspapers, has a policy of giving the targets of an attack an
opportunity to respond for purposes of the story. Had I been called and
told that The Crimson planned to publish Finkelstein’s accusations of
perjury and fraud, I would have reminded the reporter that Finkelstein
accuses virtually every pro-Israel writer of these literary crimes. I
also would have reminded the writer that when Finkelstein first made
these accusations more than two years ago, I insisted that Harvard
investigate them. Former Harvard President Derek C. Bok was appointed
to conduct the investigation and found no plagiarism. Neither did James
Freedman, the former president of Dartmouth and the American Academy of
Arts & Sciences. The Harvard Law librarian concluded that my use of
citations was certainly correct. I also would have told the reporter
that despite Finkelstein’s implication to the contrary, I cited Joan
Peters eight times in my book and disagreed with her conclusions.
Following
Finkelstein’s speech I was told by a student that Finkelstein had
accused me of having recently flown to Israel “to advise their
government on how to suppress the free speech of Israeli pilots.” I
called The Crimson reporter and told her that was a lie. Now
Finkelstein is claiming that it is true and he provided four sources to
prove his point. One of the articles is in German and another in
Hebrew, languages which Finkelstein does not read or understand. I have
had them translated and neither of them supports his false allegation
that I tried to suppress the free speech of Israeli pilots. The truth
is, that I have repeatedly defended the right of Israeli pilots to
publicize their disagreement with Israel’s policy of targeted killing,
despite my personal disagreement with their views on the merits of the
issue. Indeed, I have praised Israel for allowing such dissent even
from its own soldiers. I have never—and would never—“advise[d] their
government on how to suppress the free speech of Israeli pilots.”
Finkelstein’s statement that I did so is a categorical and all too
characteristic lie. I went to Israel to participate in, and encourage,
the open marketplace of ideas about a controversial practice.
That
is why it is important to heed the following warning of the historian
Peter Novick, who, according to Finkelstein, inspired his scholarship:
“No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts,
no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate, without
taking the time to carefully compare his claims with the sources he
cites.” When one checks the sources, more often than not it turns out
that Finkelstein just makes it up out of whole cloth.
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ
Cambridge, Mass.
Nov. 7, 2005
The writer is Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.