News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
Students may have been buying the Urban Outfitters T-shirt proclaiming “Voting is For Old People” earlier this month, but a Harvard survey predicts that come November, an increasing number of young people will be headed to the polls.
Election interest among young adults is up sharply from 2000, according to a poll released last week by the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government (KSG).
Compared to the week of Super Tuesday in 2000, 2004 saw hikes in the percentages of people between the ages of 18 and 30 who had spoken about the election, thought about the election and read, heard or seen an election-related news story in the past day.
And this substantially larger youth participation in the 2004 presidential race, compared with the 2000 race, is almost a sure indicator of higher voting numbers come November, said Thomas E. Patterson, Bradlee Professor of Government and the Press at KSG.
Patterson also said he was surprised by the “significant jump in interest of young adults” compared to relatively static numbers for those older than 30.
The recent upsurge is likely related to the belief that the upcoming election has particularly high stakes for the country, according to the study, which surveyed 1,000 people.
During the Super Tuesday contests, almost three in every five young adults surveyed felt the election would have “a great deal” or “quite a bit” of impact on the future of the country, the survey revealed.
Patterson said that the specific issues of 2004—a war and a struggling economy—distinguish this election from the last contest.
This upsurge in involvement may signal a reverse of a decline in youth voting participation. While the 1972 turnout rate for young adults in the general election was nearly 50 percent, in 2000, it was barely 30 percent.
Institute of Politics (IOP) Director Daniel R. Glickman said the survey’s results reinforce what he has been seeing for the last year and a half.
“There is an upkick in young voters,” he said.
These survey results come just weeks after Urban Outfitters discontinued a “Voting is for Old People” T-shirt that drew criticism from organizations across the country, including the IOP, which claimed that the shirt promotes political apathy among young people.
“‘Hooray, it’s happening. Young people are influencing the political system,’” Glickman quipped as a suggestion for a new Urban Outfitters tee.
Jonathan S. Chavez ’05, who directs a semiannual survey at the IOP, agreed that these national numbers correlate with a surge in political excitement at Harvard.
“It is exactly the sort of sense we have been getting...a sense of excitement about the 2004 election. The millennial generation does care about politics and the choice of who is going to be president does matter to us,” Chavez said.
The IOP conducts a poll of 1,200 undergraduates nationwide which explores youth civic engagement and student views toward politics and public service.
While Chavez said the IOP poll does not ask exactly the same questions as the Shorenstein poll, he said the Shorenstein results are “definitely in line with what we’ve gotten.”
Chavez said that IOP surveys since 2000 have shown “an increase in interest in politics, public service and all forms of political involvement.”
“Negative views towards government have been going down—students don’t view politicians as being self-interested as much anymore,” he said.
But while the latest IOP poll results won’t come out until April, IOP President Ilan T. Graff ’05 said that even without looking at numbers, the participation at recent IOP events speaks for itself.
“Any event we have done on campus that has been election related has generated a phenomenal amount of interest,” he said, citing election-related IOP study groups as well as Tuesday night campaign-related roundtable discussions.
“For the [MSNBC] Hardball series, for example, we had to lottery every single event,” Graff said.
IOP fellow and political journalist Lynn Sweet said she has noticed the political fervor of the undergraduate students in her study group, “Reality Politics.”
“Everything I’ve seen since I started at the IOP this semester seems to be in line with that analysis,” she said. “The students I work with at the IOP are very informed and even excited about the election. The students I have met this semester, seem to me, students that will end up voting in the fall.”
Harvard College Democrats President Andy J. Frank ’05 said he has also noticed increased political energy this year.
“Its going to be crazy come the fall!” Frank said.
And he said heightened interest isn’t only restricted to IOP regulars.
“What I find really interesting is that my friends that aren’t as interested in politics are talking about the presidential election in a way that I’ve never really heard them talk about politics before,” Frank said.
—Staff writer Faryl W. Ury can be reached at ury@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.