News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
To the editors:
After reading The Crimson’s Nov. 10 article, “Student Accused of Violating Copyrights,” my heart goes out to Derek A. Slater ’05. As someone who has for many years been attempting to induce the electronic voting machine vendors to provide a reasonable amount of integrity and accountability in their voting systems, I am horrified at Diebold Election Systems’ attempt to use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to further their regressive practice of hiding behind copyrights in an industry whose products are fundamentally flawed by an almost complete absence of meaningful assurance that votes are entered and counted correctly—and whose proprietary software is intended to be protected from effective scrutiny. In these systems, there are no audit trails and no real evidence that something might have gone wrong or been maliciously defrauded. Integrity and democracy must be protected, not questionable practices.
Peter G. Neumann ’54
Nov. 10, 2003
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.