News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

Letters

Crimson Mistakes Role Of Ombudsperson

Letter to the Editors

By Frank E.A. Sander

To the editors:

Your editorial on the newly appointed ombudsman (“Ombuds and Upwards,” Oct. 24) regrettably uses interchangeably the terms “ombudsperson,” “mediator,” and “arbitrator.” While there are some differences between the first two terms—a mediator, unlike an ombudsman, normally does not investigate, he primarily facilitates communication between the parties—there is a critical difference between these two and an arbitrator. An arbitrator is a private judge who renders a binding decision, which would be inappropriate for an ombudsman, as your editorial appears to recognize.

Frank E.A. Sander

Oct. 25, 2002

The writer is Bussey professor of law and an associate dean at Harvard Law School. He is a representative on the Ombuds Council.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Letters