News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
The Undergraduate Council tackled its longest docket in recent memory last night and still made it home almost in time for The Simpsons.
At last night's meeting, the council wove its way through a packed docket that included constitutional amendments, student center support bills and a resolution "to recognize and honor" Dean of Students Archie C. Epps III.
But thanks to efficient parliamentary procedure, the resolution honoring Epps and another endorsing the annual "Take Back the Night" event were approved in a matter of minutes, and the council spent minimal time debating the four other items on the docket.
In what Council President Noah Z. Seton '00 called "the wild and crazy Sam show," Samuel C. Cohen '00 presented four bills in a row.
The two bills that incurred the most debate dealt with the council's push for a student center.
The strikingly similar bills both called for student group space, performance space and communal study space for students. However, the first bill proposed a new building to house these facilities while the second took a softer approach.
Cohen said his rationale for supporting both bills was that one represented his ideal, while the second was more of a compromise. He said the second bill is more likely to gain the support of Dean of the College Harry R. Lewis '68, who signs or vetoes all council legislation.
The second bill, Cohen said, is more likely to win Lewis' support because it asks for student facilities without specifying that they be located together.
Nevertheless, by supporting just the second bill, Lewis would still "become an advocate within the administration for [the student center initiative]," Cohen said.
"I know Dean Lewis will not sign this bill," Cohen said, referring to the stronger proposal. "But he'll need to give us his rationale why he rejected it. And that gives us something to work with."
"For now, it's better to have partial support from an administrator than have him completely opposed to us," he said.
Adams House representative Eric M. Nelson '99 took issue with Cohen's maneuvering, saying the council would show weak resolve by "throwing [the second bill] in as sort of a softball...a gesture [Lewis] doesn't have to take seriously."
Despite Nelson's objections, both bills passed by large margins, and Seton said he would present both proposals to Lewis this week.
Cohen's other two proposals were constitutional amendments that dealt with representation in the Houses.
Cohen proposed changing the language in the council constitution that allows Houses to have at least three representatives. He said the proposal was targeted at Dudley House, which currently has less than 80 undergraduates affiliated with it.
"Every other House has one representative for every 75 undergraduates," Cohen said. "Dudley has one for every 20."
"The tyranny of Dudley is not really a threat to the council," argued Shai M. Sachs '01, who said that allowing Dudley the extra votes would not skew representation.
A roll call vote will be taken on the amendments over the next week.
In other business, Seton reminded members that voting on the council's term bill referendum begins today.
Students can use the ucvote program to vote for or against a $20 increase in their optional term bill fee, which goes directly to the council.
"Put up posters," Seton said. "Knock on doors. We want students to vote for this."
Also, Alex A. Boni-Saenz '01 announced that he will make a motion next Sunday to rescind the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) bill, which passed at last week's meeting.
The bill, which met with controversy within the council and the student body, originally called for a return of ROTC to campus.
The council amended it to support Harvard students in the program and not the program itself, but some students still challenged it, saying it supported the military's discriminatory "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward homosexuals.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.