News

When Professors Speak Out, Some Students Stay Quiet. Can Harvard Keep Everyone Talking?

News

Allston Residents, Elected Officials Ask for More Benefits from Harvard’s 10-Year Plan

News

Nobel Laureate Claudia Goldin Warns of Federal Data Misuse at IOP Forum

News

Woman Rescued from Freezing Charles River, Transported to Hospital with Serious Injuries

News

Harvard Researchers Develop New Technology to Map Neural Connections

Remove Existing Limits

Dissent

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The measure suggested by Ballot Question 2 is just one more contribution to the muddled landscape of campaign finance regulations. It is objectionable on innumerable grounds. For instance, it does nothing to prevent individuals from personally financing their campaigns at levels far above the cap on public disbursements. And even if all the candidates abided by the conditions that would control the availability of public funds, the resulting equity in spending would merely enhance the already powerful advantage of incumbency.

Further, it compels taxpayers to financially support political perspectives which they may find abhorrent. The only workable solution to the campaign financing quandary is to remove the existing limits on personal contributions that force candidates to devote so much time to fundraising and makes them so dependent on soft money. --Melissa Rose Langsam '00   Noah D. Oppenheim '00

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags