News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

Widener Slasher Found Guilty Of Destruction

Convicted on Two of Seven Counts

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Stephen L. Womack, the so-called Widener slasher, was found guilty of two counts of malicious destruction by a Middlesex Superior Court jury yesterday.

Womack, who was charged with mutilating millions of dollars worth of rare books, was acquitted on one count of extortion.

The jury was unable to reach a verdict on four separate indictments of extortion and a mistrial was declared on those counts.

Womack, who awaits a sentencing hearing on March 14, faces up to 10 years in jail and a possible fine, according to Assistant District Attorney Anthony Gemma, who prosecuted the case.

A former Widener Library employee, Womack plead not guilty to charges leveled against him in December 1994, which included a count of receiving stolen property.

But Womack later changed his plea on that count and admitted to slashing the books.

Yesterday the jury found that Womack maliciously destroyed the books in his possession.

On the extortion charges, the jury was trying to decide whether Womack intended to follow through with a series of bomb threats he made in letters to Widener Library and to Northeastern's Snell Library.

According to Womack's lawyer Lee P. Johnson, the district attorney and judge agreed that a mistrial was appropriate given the amount of time the jury was taking to decide the four extortion counts.

Gemma said he was disappointed that the jury could not reach a verdict on all counts, but that the facts of the case were clear.

"This case was unusual in that the facts were not in dispute as much as other cases," Gemma said. "The inferences and intent of the defendant were the issue, so I am not sure I could have presented it in a different way."

Gemma credited the head defense attorney, William P. Homans '41, with arguing a strong case, resulting in the conviction on only two of the seven counts.

"Mr. Homans is probably one of the smartest defense attorneys in Boston," Gemma said. "I am not surprised at all."

Johnson said the defense team plans to reserve any statement on the verdict until after the sentencing.

Johnson would not comment on whether he plans to issue an appeal.

Case History

The verdict likely marks the end of the six-year-long case, which has included an investigation by federal, state and College authorities and cost the University hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Between 1990 and 1992, Womack terrorized security officials at Widener Library and Northeastern's Snell Library with a series of carefully planned attacks on books relating to church history and linguistics.

Womack also tried to extort money from Northeastern and threatened to bomb libraries on both campuses if Jewish employees were not fired.

In another threat, Womack said he planned to blow up a bank unless money was left for him in the Widener stacks.

During the trial's closing arguments, the prosecution told the jury that Womack's actions were motivated by revenge.

"This case is based on deliberate choices made by the defendant," Gemma told the jury Tuesday. "It is a case about hatred, the desire to control others."

The defense argued that Womack had no intention of following through with his threats to extort money or commit violent acts.

"A reasonable person would have a difficult time believing that he had intended to [follow through with his threat to] extort money, hurt people or make people act against their will," Homans said in court.

Homans pointed to the fact that Womack did not pick up his ransom money, although it was planted in obscure locations in Widener as requested, as evidence that Womack did not intend to follow through on his threats.

Womack's anger at the system, Homans argued, stemmed from his having spent two years in Massachusetts hospitals after serving jail time for a 1987 crime.

Womack was captured in 1994 after an investigation conducted by Harvard and Northeastern police and the FBI.

--Todd F. Braunstein, Marios V. Broustas and Rachel C. Telegen contributed to the reporting of this article.

Womack also tried to extort money from Northeastern and threatened to bomb libraries on both campuses if Jewish employees were not fired.

In another threat, Womack said he planned to blow up a bank unless money was left for him in the Widener stacks.

During the trial's closing arguments, the prosecution told the jury that Womack's actions were motivated by revenge.

"This case is based on deliberate choices made by the defendant," Gemma told the jury Tuesday. "It is a case about hatred, the desire to control others."

The defense argued that Womack had no intention of following through with his threats to extort money or commit violent acts.

"A reasonable person would have a difficult time believing that he had intended to [follow through with his threat to] extort money, hurt people or make people act against their will," Homans said in court.

Homans pointed to the fact that Womack did not pick up his ransom money, although it was planted in obscure locations in Widener as requested, as evidence that Womack did not intend to follow through on his threats.

Womack's anger at the system, Homans argued, stemmed from his having spent two years in Massachusetts hospitals after serving jail time for a 1987 crime.

Womack was captured in 1994 after an investigation conducted by Harvard and Northeastern police and the FBI.

--Todd F. Braunstein, Marios V. Broustas and Rachel C. Telegen contributed to the reporting of this article.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags