News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
I am writing in regard to your editorial "Canadians Set Pace in Gun Control" (staff editorial, Feb. 20). The line of the editorial I question read, "But only gun control has had the proven effect of increasing security--and life expectancy." I ask where is this "proven" effect?
Is it to be found in New York City or Washington D.C., which have some of the most restrictive gun laws and yet some of the highest crime rates in the nation? Or is it in Alaska or Montana, which have very lenient gun laws and yet much lower crime rates?
Gun control advocates cannot even establish a clear correlation between gun control and lowered crime. Until they can, I don't see how they can claim they have "proven" anything. Randy Karger '98
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.