News

Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search

News

First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni

News

Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend

News

Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library

News

Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty

Randomization is Best

DISSENT

By Sarah J. Schaffer

Can a house have too much diversity? The staff seems to thinks so. By again defending non-ordered choice-- whether with four or six choices--the staff continues to inhibit true diversity. Homogeneous populations don't add character to a house. Instead, demographic biases in the houses deprive students of an important part of their education: learning to live with all kinds of people.

Randomization need not separate friends; a block of 20 or 16 could easily accomodate most groups seeking to stay together. But why allow similar groups such a high probability of living in the same house? The most enriching kind of interpersonal interaction starts the way it did for first-years, with complete randomization.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags