News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

Thomas Confirmation Debated

Panelists Say Harassment Issue Was Handled Poorly

By Jenna B. Mcneill

Two academics, a feminist activist and a state Republican Party official squared off Wednesday night at a Kennedy School of Government forum, arguing over the just-concluded confirmation hearings of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

The panelists, who drew a crowd of more than 200 to the Institute of Politics event, agreed that Anita Hill's charge of sexual harassment was handled poorly by the Senate.

Anne Lewis, chair of the Commission for Women's Equality, said that the hearings had the effect of trivializing and "trashing" sexual harrassment as an issue and Anita Hill as an individual.

Lewis, who added that she felt Hill would have been treated more fairly by a committee of women, went on to criticize President Bush for presenting Thomas as the best candidate for the job.

Bush 'Lied'

Glen Loury, a former Kennedy School professor currently teaching at Boston University, said that Bush "lied" in saying that Thomas was more qualified than other candidates.

"Bush should have distinguished between creating quotas and encouraging diversity on the Supreme Court," Loury said.

Loury ultimately praised Thomas, however, saying that he will represent Americans well.

"Mr. Thomas will serve the court and the country with honor and distinction in the years ahead," Loury said.

Alan Safran, spokesperson for the Massachusetts Republican Party, said he believed that the Senate was right in confirming Thomas, since he was not proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt."

But Professor of Law Christopher Edley said that he did not think proof beyond a reasonable doubt was necessary for Thomas's rejection.

"The nominee has a hard burden of proving that he deserves to be on the high court," Edley said.

Edley added that the Senate hearings were "very problematic," both before and after Anita Hill's allegations were taken up.

Safran also harshly criticized the Senate Democrats, whom he said had likely leaked Hill's allegations to the press.

"The perpetrator should be dismissed from the Senate," Safran said.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags