News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
Dr. Fred L. Whipple, former director of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Phillips Professor of Astronomy at Harvard University, has been named recipient of the Smithsonian Institution's prestigious Henry Medal.
The medal, named for Joseph Henry, the pioneer American physicist and first Secretary of the Smithsonian, is presented to those individuals whose careers have combined unusual personal accomplishments in the arts or sciences with extraordinary service to their nation. The medal has been presented only four times since 1893.
Dr. Whipple was cited for his leadership of the Observatory during the early days of the national space program to the present and for his contributions to man's understanding of the solar system.
The award was presented to Whipple last night by U.S. Congressman William Minshall (Rep.-Ohio), a member of the Smithsonian's Board of Regents and the House Appropriations Committee.
The award ceremony highlighted a three-day scientific symposium honoring Whipple on his retirement as director of the Smithsonian Observatory. Some 150 astrophysicists from around the country gathered here to discuss "The Dusty Universe." Topics concerned problems in astronomy common to the theories of cosmic condensation and the evolution of the universe.
Fred L. Whipple is internationally known for his research on the moon, meteors, and comets. Although retired from the responsibilities of overseeing some 60 Smithsonian scientists engaged in is a slate in name only, with its members holding different positions on major issues, it is expected to help the conservative voter identify his kind of politicians.
The aftermath of the CCA victory two years ago disillusioned many city liberals, as the coalition fell apart with the alienation of Owens from his four CCA compatriots. The CCA candidates fulfilled their pledge to appoint a new school superintendent but failed to replace City Manager Corcoran.
This year, Saundra Graham, the council's lone radical, has broken her former ties with the CCA to run with five other radicals on the GRO slate. The GRO platform advocates the ouster of Corcoran and greater community control through police civilian review boards and a review process to oversee development.
Yet another procedural issue could influence the fate of Graham's GRO slate. The annual student registration controversy prompted at least preliminary inquiries by the state Attorney General's office this year. Many students have claimed that the city Election Commission has arbitrarily denied them the right to vote here.
Both the CCA and GRO stand to gain votes from student participation and earlier in the campaign they joined forces for a registration drive among students and non-voters.
As for substantive issues, many are of the motherhood and apple pie variety, with only slight differences in phrasing or emphasis distinguishing the supposed conservative from the avowed liberal or radical.
The following is a brief rundown of what the candidates are talking about:
TAXES--Cambridge's real property tax is the third highest in the Boston area, topped only by Boston and Chelsea. Predictably, none of the candidates advocate increased taxes, although their programs for stabilizing the present tax vary. Some favor redistribution of the tax burden within the city (for instance, the Socialist Workers Party would tax businesses while removing taxes on incomes under $15,000 or property valued at less than $30,000) or between the state and city.
Other strategies call for utilization of federal revenue sharing funds, replacement of the property tax with a sales tax, the taxing of presently exempt universities, and reduction of "waste and inefficiency" in the municipal government.
HOUSING--Everyone agrees that the city's housing supply must be upgraded. For whom and how is the question. Conservatives such as Danehy argue that the city has already built more low-income housing than it can absorb, creating a demand for city services that it cannot fulfill. Danehy wants a moratorium on public housing construction.
Others urge the use of Federal subsidy programs to rehabilitate existing structures and construct scatter-site
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.