News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
PRESIDENT BOK'S statements on ROTC to the Committee on Houses and Undergraduate Life only underscore that committee's shortsightedness in failing to conduct an undergraduate referendum on ROTC.
Bok's memories of ROTC's abolition do not mesh with facts. In 1969, the Faculty insisted only that ROTC be given no special privileges; the Corporation, not the Faculty, negotiated ROTC's withdrawal. Bok said the 1969 decision was made in great haste. It was, in fact, made after months of hearings and committee reports.
President Bok told CHUL that a petition from students at any graduate school would lead him to re-open the study of ROTC. This is difficult to reconcile with CHUL's refusal to respond to a petition of 2500 undergraduates calling for a simple vote.
At its next meeting, the CHUL should reconsider the New American Movement petition. It is not too late to begin a student-initiated debate or to respond to Bok's "personal opinions" with a genuine expression of student sentiment.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.