News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
A United States District Court judge yesterday invalidated Massachusett's six-month residency requirement for voting.
The decision will not affect voting in the April 25th presidential primary, Attorney General Robert Quinn said yesterday. He explained that the ruling abolishes the residency requirement only for future state and local elections.
The only residency stipulation still presently in force in Massachusetts is the 30-day requirement established by Congress for presidential elections.
Judge Francis J. Ford, in a three paragraph opinion, ruled that in accordance with the opinion handed down last month by the U.S. Supreme Court invalidating Tennessee's one-year residency law, the Massachusetts requirement is illegal.
In a March decision, the Supreme Court held that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not permit a state to deny the right to vote to "new residents" while allowing "old residents" to vote.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.