News
Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department
News
Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins
News
Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff
News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided
News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
A United States District Court judge yesterday invalidated Massachusett's six-month residency requirement for voting.
The decision will not affect voting in the April 25th presidential primary, Attorney General Robert Quinn said yesterday. He explained that the ruling abolishes the residency requirement only for future state and local elections.
The only residency stipulation still presently in force in Massachusetts is the 30-day requirement established by Congress for presidential elections.
Judge Francis J. Ford, in a three paragraph opinion, ruled that in accordance with the opinion handed down last month by the U.S. Supreme Court invalidating Tennessee's one-year residency law, the Massachusetts requirement is illegal.
In a March decision, the Supreme Court held that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not permit a state to deny the right to vote to "new residents" while allowing "old residents" to vote.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.