News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

No Decision Yet In Whitney-Sobel Disruption Trial

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Defense witnesses will take the stand this morning as the trial of Michael Sobel '72 and James M. Whitney, and associate professor from the University of Massachusetts, continues unresolved. Sobel and Whitney were arrested in connection with disturbances surrounding the Cheyney Ryan trial of October 30.

The Sobel-Whitney trial went on all day yesterday as Sobel faced charges of disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace, and Whitney charges of assault and battery on a policeman and disorderly conduct.

Witnesses for the prosecution said that Sobel had called Joseph Miceli, a plainclothesman with the Cambridge Police, a "fascist pig."

Back-Up

Molly Backup '72, however, a witness for the defense, testified that she had been near Sobel until he was arrested, and that Sobel had not screamed anything at Miceli. She added that Sobel spent that time running away from Miceli, who, she claimed, was after Sobel's camera, Sobel was trying to take pictures of the melee that followed the trial.

Prosecution witnesses also said that Whitney, after a girl had been pushed to the ground when police were clearing the courtroom, had struck Cambridge Police Captain Joseph Cusack, who wasstanding in a group of policemen surrounding the fallen girl.

Assault and Arrest

James Donnelley, a lawyer, testified that he had been keeping his attention on Whitney throughout the entire incident, and that Whitney had not struck Cusack or anyone else. He said that police officers knocked Whitney to the ground and arrested him.

Five other defense witnesses gave testimony similar to Donnelley's regarding Whitney's actions.

Donnelley's testimony was highlighted by an incident in which the prosecutor, Lt. Henry Breen, asked Donnelley whether it was not true that Donnelley had seen Breen many times before representing the Harvard Corporation and M. I. T. in cases such as the present one. Donnelley replied that he hoped Breen represented the Common-wealth of Massachusetts.

The last defense witness will be heard this morning, concluding the hearing.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags