News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

LAW FORUM CORRECTION

The Mail

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

To the Editors of the CRIMSON:

In your report of the Law School Forum on Religion and the Constitution. I am quoted as having "denied that the Bible was the best source of moral education." Of course I said nothing so presumptuous or so irrelevant to the subject under discussion.

What I said was that the decisions in the prayer and Bible-reading cases would hopefully force us to deal more vigorously with the problem of moral education in the schools; and that there were ways of doing this (through social studies, the sense of spiritual adventure is learning, and so on) beyond the recitation in of a few verses from Scriptures. The difference between such an exercise (which was in issue) and the Bible as a source of moral education (which was not) must surely be evident. Paul A. Freund   Carl M. Leob University Professor

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags