News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
Non-violent tactics in attempts at integration in the South are useless unless backed up by a threat of possible John Lowry, whose talk was sponsored by the Harvard Students for a Democratic Society, made the statement in defense of the policy of "meeting violence with violence advocated by the Monroe NAACP president, Robert F. Williams. He emphasized, however, that the basic pattern of protest must be one of non-violence. Because of misunderstandings about the meaning of his statement, Lowry added, Williams has met with resistence from other integration leaders and has been suspended from his NAACP post. Lowry said Williams made his original statement about the use of violence after sitting through a court session in Monroe at which a white man was charged with raping a Negro woman. Although corroborative evidence was submitted by a white woman, the man was acquitted. On leaving the court, Lowry went on, Williams was asked what his impressions were. Williams replied, "We cannot expect justice from this court. We must meet violence with violence." Lowry's impression is that Williams was advocating only self-defense. Misunderstandings of the statement affect Lowry directly because of his connection with Williams, although Williams had tried to dissociate himself from the Monroe picketing group. Because Lowry is under indictment for kidnaping in Monroe, he needs the support of groups which Williams's statement offended. The kidnaping incident took place at the height of the racial tension engendered by the Monroe picketing. According to Lowry, the charge stems from the fact that two Klu Klux Klan leaders, taken from their car by a group of Negroes, were forced to take refuge in Williams's house. Lowry said his only part in the incident was to move the Klansman's car to the curb.
John Lowry, whose talk was sponsored by the Harvard Students for a Democratic Society, made the statement in defense of the policy of "meeting violence with violence advocated by the Monroe NAACP president, Robert F. Williams.
He emphasized, however, that the basic pattern of protest must be one of non-violence. Because of misunderstandings about the meaning of his statement, Lowry added, Williams has met with resistence from other integration leaders and has been suspended from his NAACP post.
Lowry said Williams made his original statement about the use of violence after sitting through a court session in Monroe at which a white man was charged with raping a Negro woman. Although corroborative evidence was submitted by a white woman, the man was acquitted.
On leaving the court, Lowry went on, Williams was asked what his impressions were. Williams replied, "We cannot expect justice from this court. We must meet violence with violence." Lowry's impression is that Williams was advocating only self-defense.
Misunderstandings of the statement affect Lowry directly because of his connection with Williams, although Williams had tried to dissociate himself from the Monroe picketing group.
Because Lowry is under indictment for kidnaping in Monroe, he needs the support of groups which Williams's statement offended. The kidnaping incident took place at the height of the racial tension engendered by the Monroe picketing.
According to Lowry, the charge stems from the fact that two Klu Klux Klan leaders, taken from their car by a group of Negroes, were forced to take refuge in Williams's house. Lowry said his only part in the incident was to move the Klansman's car to the curb.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.