News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

INNER BELT

The Mail

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

To the Editors of the CRIMSON:

At the end of his thoughtful article on the Inner Belt highway Peter S. Britell says "Almost everyone will grant that the Inner Belt means progress, at least in terms of improving the Metropolitan highway situation." Actually there are many (myself included) who do not grant as much.

Of course if "improving the Metropolitan highway situation" simply means building more highways, then any addition to the system constitutes progress. But to expand is not necessarily to improve, for the construction of new roads like the Inner Belt may well add to a city's transportation problems in the long run. Cities build big roads to purge themselves of traffic jams; but the big roads attract more cars, until soon the traffic jams are as bad as ever, and the shortage of parking downtown is much worse. More cars downtown mean more use of space for parking, less for buildings, parks, and so on. The end, relentlessly being approached in some cities, is a vast highway system leading in to one huge inner parking lot where the center of the city used to be. Now the Inner Belt is not so offensive as some plans from this point of view, but it is offensive. Almost any way of spending the same amount of money on transportation (preferably rail transportation) would pay off in far more mobility for Bostonians and far less confusion and ugliness.

As Britell suggests, it is too bad to make much-needed urban renewal projects an appendage to the construction of this anti-urban monster. Richard M. Ohmann   Junior Fellow

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags