News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
"Arms control is a necessary step to disarmament," Louis B. Sohn, professor of Law, declared yesterday.
Speaking before the Hillel Round Table of World Affairs, the disarmament expert outlined policy differences between the United States and the Soviet Union on the disarmament question.
Sohn maintained that, since both nations want disarmament, the controversy is one of means, not ends. The Soviet Union advocates arms control in proportion to disarmament, he said. Thus a ten per cent decrease in arms would provide for an equal increase in inspection.
He suggested that gradual disarmament by territory rather than by arms might satisfy both nations. According to the plan, each country would distribute its arms in ten equally divided territories. The other nation would then choose one of these areas for fully controlled total disarmament.
"Though the problems of disarmament are great, they are not insuperable for nations of good will," Sohn concluded. "Certainly disarmament is a much safer alternative than the present arms race."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.