News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
Two highly partisan professors hurled political barbs at each other's presidential candidate before an overflow audience of 350 in the Kirkland Junior Common Room last night. However, both Samuel H. Beer and McGeorge Bundy, associate professors of Government, agreed that foreign policy considerations were the vital issue in this campaign.
Eisenhower will have much difficulty in carrying out his foreign policy goals, Beer asserted, "unless he has a Democratic House and Senate." A Republican controlled Congress would be led by Taft and his followers, who think "foreign policy should be adjusted by expenditures" rather than vice versa, Beer said.
Pointing to the international record of the Vandenburg-led Republicans in the 80th Congress, Bundy said, "Anything Van could do, Ike can do better." He claimed that an opposition party, frustrated and long out of power, tends to lose irresponsibility and act constructively once it regains power.
Beer claimed the evils of McCarthyism would increase with a GOP victory. Bundy, however, countered that Eisenhower could control the Wisconsin senator more effectively than Stevenson.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.