News

When Professors Speak Out, Some Students Stay Quiet. Can Harvard Keep Everyone Talking?

News

Allston Residents, Elected Officials Ask for More Benefits from Harvard’s 10-Year Plan

News

Nobel Laureate Claudia Goldin Warns of Federal Data Misuse at IOP Forum

News

Woman Rescued from Freezing Charles River, Transported to Hospital with Serious Injuries

News

Harvard Researchers Develop New Technology to Map Neural Connections

GOOD CHEER

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Significant is the fact that four out of six of Harvard's 1937 cheer leaders are swimmers, significant because when new volunteers were called for last Spring, only one major letter winner outside the ranks of the swimmers applied. Whether or not swimming be technically a major sport, in spirit it is one of our most major sports.

And that major Harvard spirit is just what this year's cheer leaders are going to try to instill into this year's stands. Whether cheering makes the team or the team makes the cheering, as in the 1936 Princeton game, is beside the point. The point is simply that last year the cheer leaders were frankly "no good." Good yell leaders form the first requisite for good cheering.

This year's sextet intend to be good. Whatever methods they employ to arouse a little more enthusiasm, they are entitled to try. There's everything to win and nothing to lose from a sincere attempt to improve Harvard's cheer leading. Charley Hutter and his mates aren't taking themselves too seriously. Articles in yesterday's and today's Crimson treated the whole matter very lightly. That's the way to take it. Cheering was and is supposed to be all in the mood of good clean fun.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags