News

HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.

News

Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend

News

What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?

News

MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal

News

Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

It is now a year and three months since the nine Scottshoro boys were put in the Death House in Birmingham to await electrocution after an obvious mistrial. In that time the case has been reviewed by the supreme Court of Alabama and finally by the United States Supreme Court. All the latter could do, although if found the trial unfair, was to order retrial in the same court and probably under mach the same conditions.

Whether or not these boys are guilty of raping two white girls found on the same train with them, a trial in which a Southern "house-swapping day, mob" plays the coercive part, should not decide their life or death. There seems to be something wrong with the system of laws which confines the decision of capital punishment to small districts, liable to unified prejudice or emotion. How many trials have been similar to this one at Scottshoro, it would be impossible to say. In this case it is almost matter of accident that the international Labor Defence got interested in it, otherwise the death sentence would have been carried out unquestioned.

Whether it be in Boston or in Alabama, there should be some provision for trying cases subject to emotionalism from an unbiased point of view. If the Fourteenth Amendment which gives right of fair trial to all individuals does not allow such a provision, some change should be made in the Constitution. To make justice possible in such cases, there ought to be a right of appeal for trial in Federal Courts.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags