News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
During the tumult of the American election, the western world has not forgotten to watch the fulfillment of prophecies which foretold little good for English Liberals. The loss of two-thirds of their seats in Commons, with the adoption into Baldwin's new cabinet of a former Liberal, Winston Churchill, and Liberal-Coalitionists, are symptoms of the disappearance of the half-way party. In fundamental agreement with the Tory policy which intends to preserve the status quo in politics and economics with just the necessary minimum of flaunting promises to catch the worker's vote, the Liberals had really lost all excuse for insisting upon a separate existence as soon as the protective tariff was defeated in the election of last January.
But if the Liberal party has died, it is because the purposes for which it lived have nearly been accomplished. The great work of the Liberals was to free English political life from the craping molds which bound it a hundred years ago. The extension of suffrage to the whole adult population, the release of education from church control, the freeing of the infant giant of industry from the tariff which favored the old hereditary landowners, the solution of the Irish problem these were the triumps of Liberalism. But they are all triumphs of negation. Once its destructive work was completed, Liberalism had no more tasks to turn to: its slogan continued to reiterate the old, old catchwords, while a new England was turning to a new party for a constructive program. After a
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.