News

When Professors Speak Out, Some Students Stay Quiet. Can Harvard Keep Everyone Talking?

News

Allston Residents, Elected Officials Ask for More Benefits from Harvard’s 10-Year Plan

News

Nobel Laureate Claudia Goldin Warns of Federal Data Misuse at IOP Forum

News

Woman Rescued from Freezing Charles River, Transported to Hospital with Serious Injuries

News

Harvard Researchers Develop New Technology to Map Neural Connections

FRESHMAN DEBATERS LOSE TO YALE AND PRINCETON

Both Affirmative and Negative Teams Are Unsuccessful in Discussing Possibility of Revising Treaty of Versailles

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Freshman debaters suffered a double defeat last Saturday night when Princeton gained a 2-1 decision over the 1926 Crimson team upholding the affirmative of the proposition "Resolved: That the United States should call together the powers signatory to the Versailles Treaty to consider revision of that Treaty", in Sanders Theatre, and when the Crimson team upholding the affirmative of the same question was unanimously defeated by Yale at New Haven. Although the decision of the judges favored Princeton, the Crimson speakers here gained the decision of the audience by a narrow margin.

The deciding factor in the winning of the debate for Princeton was probably the emphasis of the moral duty of America to interfere.

The 1926 men who spoke at New Haven were H. M. Davidson, A. D. Phillips, and P. G. Kirk. Their opponents of Yale were C. A. Moore, J. G. Becker, and J. A. Davenport. Those who spoke at Cambridge for the University were: H. M. Hart, F. S. Tupper, and J. W. Perkins, while J. R. McCullough, J. C. L. Waterman, and Barlow Henderson took the affirmative for Princeton.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags