News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
Tonight's mass meeting at the New Lecture Hall on the results of the Washington Conference has every indication of being one of the outstanding events of the college year. The Conference has been "written up" from every possible angle. Under the guise of "personalities at Washington", we have been informed of Mr. Balfour's taste in breakfast foods and we know that M. Viviani detests golf. "Inside" articles by special correspondents have told us on one day, that the Japanese delegates to a man would oppose any form of reduction in armament; on the next, that the Japanese policy was wholeheartedly behind the Hughes proposals. As a result we know really very little of what actually went on at Washington, either what was done, or who was doing it. Therefore, to have the whole work of the Conference summed up for us by two such men as Professor Wilson and Professor Blakeslee, both of international reputation, authorities in their fields, and both intimately connected with the events of the past few weeks at Washington; to have significant features pointed out, the opposing forces explained, and the probabilities in regard to the ratification of the various treaties weighed; is a rare privilege unlikely to occur again here or anywhere else.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.