News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
A movement is on foot to investigate the causes of the fundamental weakness of the track team with a view to making clear and, if possible, to eradicate the faults of the track system in the University. It is an obvious fact that during the past ten years at least the standing of track in the University has seriously declined. Since 1909 the team has not won a single intercollegiate track meet.
The great fault seems to lie in the lack of well-balanced teams. It has been the notable stars and point-winners who have kept up interest in track.
Cornell has won from the University for the past three years, while against Yale three out of the last four meets have been defeats. In the past decade but a single victory has been scored in the intercollegiates. The following record of track during the past ten years shows a general decline: Meets With Dartmouth. Intercollegiates. Summary. Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Intercollegiates. Summary. Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Summary.
Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.