News
HMS Is Facing a Deficit. Under Trump, Some Fear It May Get Worse.
News
Cambridge Police Respond to Three Armed Robberies Over Holiday Weekend
News
What’s Next for Harvard’s Legacy of Slavery Initiative?
News
MassDOT Adds Unpopular Train Layover to Allston I-90 Project in Sudden Reversal
News
Denied Winter Campus Housing, International Students Scramble to Find Alternative Options
The Harvard Union held its second debate at Sever Hall last evening on the question, "Resolved, that the safety of the country calls for additional restrictions upon immigration." On the affirmative Messes. Chenowith '88, and Heseltine, '88, were the principal disputants against Messrs. Shoemaker, '89, and Proctor, '89, on the negative. After these gentlemen had finished, the debate was thrown open to the house and interesting discussions ensued. The vote taken was as follows: On the merits of the question, affirmative, 29; negative, 14; on the arguments of the principal disputants, affirmative, 21; negative, 45; and on the debate as a whole, affirmative, 17; negative, 26.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.